English
English
In the case of file checksum integrity verification, md5_file() is one of the commonly used functions in PHP. It directly reads the file content and calculates the MD5 hash value, which facilitates quick detection of files whether they have been tampered with or damaged. However, the MD5 value obtained by simply relying on md5_file() also has security risks, such as collision attacks. Therefore, many developers will try to enhance the strength of file verification by "adding salt". So, is it feasible to use md5_file() function with salt value to enhance file verification? This article will discuss this.
The md5_file() function will directly calculate the MD5 hash value for the content of the specified file. The sample code is as follows:
$hash = md5_file('path/to/file.txt');
echo $hash;
It returns a 32-bit hexadecimal string representing the unique "fingerprint" of the file. The calculation results should be consistent if the file has not been tampered with.
"Add salt" is a common method in cryptography. It is usually to attach an additional random string (called "salt") to the original data and then hash calculations. Its main function is to prevent pre-computing rainbow table attacks, allowing the hash value of the same content to be different.
In the file verification scenario, some developers want to add salt to the hash of the file content, hoping to improve security and avoid simple hash collisions or tampering.
A common practice is to first use md5_file() to calculate the hash value of the file, then splice this hash value with salt, and then do md5 again, for example:
$fileHash = md5_file('path/to/file.txt');
$salt = 'random_salt_string';
$enhancedHash = md5($fileHash . $salt);
echo $enhancedHash;
The $enhancedHash generated in this way is the file hash value with salt.
Avoid simple hash collisions : simply replacing the file can result in the same md5 value if an attacker knows the content of the file. But if the salt value is kept confidential, it will be difficult for an attacker to construct a new file that matches the salt hash.
Prevent pre-computing attacks : Attackers cannot easily reverse restore files through pre-computing hash libraries.
Salt value management : Salt must be confidential and fixed, otherwise it will lose its meaning. And if the salt is lost, the file cannot be verified.
There is no guarantee that the file content cannot be forged : if the attacker knows both the file content and the salt value, he or she can still construct the collision file.
MD5 itself lacks security : MD5 has been proven to have serious collision problems, especially for collision files that are actively constructed by attackers, which are not safe. It is recommended to use a safer hashing algorithm (such as SHA-256) instead of MD5.
Performance overhead : Compute an additional hash, with a slight impact on performance, but is usually negligible.
Use a safer hash algorithm : PHP 7 and above recommends using hash_file('sha256', $filename) , which can replace md5_file() .
Combining salt with key (HMAC) : Encrypting file hash with HMAC algorithms (such as hash_hmac() ) can more securely verify integrity and tamper-proof.
Digital signature mechanism : Combined with the public key and private key digital signature to ensure the authenticity of the file.
For example, use SHA-256 and salt:
$fileHash = hash_file('sha256', 'path/to/file.txt');
$salt = 'random_salt_string';
$enhancedHash = hash('sha256', $fileHash . $salt);
echo $enhancedHash;
Or use HMAC:
$salt = 'secret_key';
$hash = hash_hmac('sha256', file_get_contents('path/to/file.txt'), $salt);
echo $hash;
Simply using md5_file() with salt value for secondary hashing can increase the difficulty of file verification to a certain extent, but this is far from the safest solution. It is recommended to use a more secure hashing algorithm and a combination of HMAC or digital signature technology to ensure file integrity and security. If MD5 is still used in the project, risks and application scenarios should be carefully considered.
