Current Location: Home> Latest Articles> Main Differences Between PHP Functions and Elm Functions

Main Differences Between PHP Functions and Elm Functions

M66 2025-07-11

Main Differences Between PHP Functions and Elm Functions

PHP and Elm are two fundamentally different programming languages with notable distinctions in how they handle functions. PHP functions are flexible, while Elm functions emphasize type safety and side-effect-free programming. Below is a detailed comparison of the two.

PHP Functions

  • PHP functions are declared using the function keyword, followed by the function name, parameters, and function body.
  • PHP functions can return a value, or directly output a result within the function body.
  • PHP functions can accept any number of parameters, including other functions as parameters.
  • PHP uses a weak typing system, meaning parameters and return values can be of any type.
  • PHP functions allow the use of global variables, which can lead to side effects, especially in larger applications.

PHP Function Example:

function sum(int $a, int $b) {
    return $a + $b;
}

Elm Functions

  • Elm functions are declared using the val or fun keyword, along with the function name and type signature.
  • Elm functions always return a value, and the type correctness is checked at compile time.
  • Elm functions accept a fixed number of parameters, each with a specific type annotation.
  • Elm uses a strong typing system, ensuring that parameters and return values match the specified types.
  • Elm functions are immutable and do not use global variables, thus avoiding side effects.

Elm Function Example:

val sum : Int -> Int -> Int
sum a b =
  a + b

Practical Example: Calculating the Sum of Two Numbers

PHP Example:

function sum(int $a, int $b) {
    return $a + $b;
}
echo sum(5, 10); // Output: 15

Elm Example:

import Prelude

sum : Int -> Int -> Int
sum a b =
  a + b

main =
  print (sum 5 10) -- Output: 15

Conclusion

PHP and Elm functions differ significantly in terms of syntax, type systems, and side effect handling. PHP's flexibility makes it suitable for a wide range of applications but can lead to runtime errors and side effects. In contrast, Elm's strong typing and immutability make it a better choice for building reliable and maintainable applications.