Current Location: Home> Latest Articles> Which is Faster: md5_file() or hash_file('md5')? PHP File Hashing Performance Compared

Which is Faster: md5_file() or hash_file('md5')? PHP File Hashing Performance Compared

M66 2025-08-05

In PHP, when we need to get the MD5 hash of a file, two frequently used functions are md5_file() and hash_file('md5'). These two functions are very similar in function, both returning the MD5 hash of a given file. But are they really identical in performance? If you're building a system that involves calculating hashes for large volumes of files—such as deduplication, file integrity checks, or CDN cache validation—this question becomes particularly important.

Function Overview

md5_file()

This is a built-in PHP shortcut function used to directly calculate the MD5 hash of a file.

$md5 = md5_file('/var/www/m66.net/uploads/sample.jpg');

It uses PHP's native MD5 implementation and is a single-purpose, encapsulated function.

hash_file('md5')

This function is part of PHP’s hash extension, which allows you to specify the hashing algorithm. When 'md5' is passed as a parameter, its behavior is the same as md5_file().

$md5 = hash_file('md5', '/var/www/m66.net/uploads/sample.jpg');

Compared to md5_file(), hash_file() supports more algorithms such as sha1, sha256, and so on, making it more versatile.

Performance Comparison Test

To accurately assess the performance difference between these two functions, we built the following test script:

$filepath = '/var/www/m66.net/uploads/bigfile.zip';
<p>$start = microtime(true);<br>
for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++) {<br>
md5_file($filepath);<br>
}<br>
$end = microtime(true);<br>
echo "md5_file(): " . ($end - $start) . " seconds\n";</p>
<p>$start = microtime(true);<br>
for ($i = 0; $i < 100; $i++) {<br>
hash_file('md5', $filepath);<br>
}<br>
$end = microtime(true);<br>
echo "hash_file('md5'): " . ($end - $start) . " seconds\n";<br>

We executed the above code on a moderately powered server using a file roughly 100MB in size. The results were as follows:

md5_file(): 4.32 seconds
hash_file('md5'): 4.38 seconds

Analysis

From the results, the performance difference between the two is minimal. md5_file() is slightly faster, but the difference is less than 2%. Given the potential fluctuations from network or disk cache effects, this difference can be considered negligible in most applications.

However, hash_file() offers the flexibility to choose different algorithms. If you plan to switch to another hash algorithm in the future (e.g., SHA-256), hash_file() is more scalable.

Usage Recommendations

  • Use md5_file() when: You only need MD5 and prefer maximum simplicity in your code.

  • Use hash_file() when: Your project needs to support multiple hash algorithms or might need to switch algorithms in the future.

Special Cases to Note

In some edge-case environments, specific PHP versions or system compilation parameters may impact the performance of these functions. If your application is extremely performance-sensitive, it is recommended to run benchmarks in your actual target environment.

Conclusion